How did each of the following lead to german unification

The German Empire was founded on January 18, 1871 after the victory of Prussia in the Franco-Prussian war and meant the unification of the different German states around Prussia, excluding Austria, under the leadership of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. A period of great development of the German nation began in all fields: economic, geographical, political and military.

However, as the Germans discovered, great speeches, flags, and enthusiastic crowds, a constitution, a political reorganization and the provision of an imperial superstructure; and the revised Customs Union from 1867 to 1868, still did not make a nation.

A key element of the nation-state is the creation of a national culture, often but not necessarily. Through national politics the Kulturkampf (which followed a political, economic, and administrative unification model tried to go in that direction, with a notable lack of success, with some contradictions in German society. Specifically, it was a struggle for language, education and religion A policy of Germanization of non-German people in the empire's population, including Poles and Danes, began with language, in particular, the German language, compulsory schooling (Germanization) , and the attempt to create standardized curricula for those schools to promote and celebrate the idea of a shared past. Another important element in building the nation

Explanation:

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”