subject
History, 28.03.2020 08:57 Jakethedog210

A graph titled Funding for House Elections 2011 to 2012 shows parties on the horizontal axis and dollars (hundreds of millions) on the vertical axis. Approximately 610 of Republican funding was total raised, 200 was P A C funding, and 350 was individual funding. Approximately 490 of Democratic funding was total raised, 165 was P A C funding, and 290 was individual funding. Look at this graph, showing funding for campaigns for election to the House of Representatives, 2011–2012. What is the most logical conclusion that can be drawn from this graph? Both parties are dependent on raising huge sums of money to fund their House campaigns. PAC spending is not a significant factor when it comes to raising money for House campaigns. The Democrats will always raise more money for House campaigns from individuals than the Republicans will. Campaign funding laws have reduced the amount of money needed to fund House campaigns.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
What is the main idea of this excerpt? 1.1.3
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
The second continental congress: a. made provisions for a continental army with george washington as commander-in-chief b. adopted a “declaration of causes of necessity of taking up arms” c. endorsed the olive branch petition d. all of the above
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
President roosevelt launched the bold new programs that became known as the second new deal primarily because
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Mary i was a ruler known for her kindness and tried to make england a catholic country. t or f
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A graph titled Funding for House Elections 2011 to 2012 shows parties on the horizontal axis and dol...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.09.2020 02:01
question
Mathematics, 25.09.2020 02:01
Questions on the website: 13722367