20 POINTS!! In 1874, how did many Sioux respond to the federal government’s order to remain on their reservation? The Sioux ignored the order and left the reservation to hunt buffalo.
The Sioux followed the order and remained on the reservation.
The Sioux followed the order and flew a white flag of truce.
The Sioux ignored the order and set up a camp near an army post.

Option: The Sioux followed the order and remained on the reservation.

Explanation:

The Native Indians after the arrival of European in America forced to give up their land for were settlers who captured their land. They pushed towards the west across the Appalachian mountains. Ultimately, forced to give up land and live in reservations. Reservations were the areas which were given to the native Indians to live and follow their customs. In 1874, Lieutenant George Custer asserted that the Sioux should give up their land as troops discover gold in the Black Hills. The government tried to confine to reservations American Indians in the region. Miners and settlers asked that the government take more land from the American Indians. The conflict began to dominate the Black Hills, which came to be known as the Great Sioux War. The result of the war was terrible for Cheyenne, Lakota and Arapaho.  

he armenian genocide, also known as the armenian holocaust, was the ottoman government's systematic extermination of 1.5 million armenians, mostly citizens within the ottoman empire.

explanation:

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!