subject
History, 17.02.2021 14:10 dontcareanyonemo

Worcester v. Georgia showed the limitations of the Constitution's provisions for checks and balances because A. the president and Congress refused to enforce the ruling, making it powerless
B. the president declared the law invalid without giving Congress a chance to override his veto
C. the state government enforced the ruling against the wishes of the federal government
D. the army took matters into their own hands, removing the Cherokee against the wishes of
Georgia, the president, and Congress

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 20.06.2019 18:04
Firms receive factors of production from households in which part of gdp would a household giving fop be considered a.) government spending b.)capital c.) net exports
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
It can be inferred that the dramatic increase in defense spending by germany was the result of. (a) attempts by great britain to take german colonies. ( b) fear of a two-front war against france and russia (c) the need to put down a communist rebellion (d) a competition with the allies to produce atomic weapons
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
What was the ultimate result of the final solution?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
Those who resisted the mongol invaders were attacked and their towns burned; those who cooperated with them also were attacked and had their towns burned. were treated fairly. were taken into the tribes and treated as mongols. were sent away to find new homes.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Worcester v. Georgia showed the limitations of the Constitution's provisions for checks and balances...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 23:37
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 23:38
question
Mathematics, 07.04.2020 23:38
question
English, 07.04.2020 23:38
Questions on the website: 13722359