3. Read the following passage and answer the question. This act established procedures of criminal justice for all of England. As a result, Henry set up courts with trained lawyers and judges, and built prisons for those awaiting trial. He also appointed judges who traveled across the country to hear court cases. Theses periodic court sessions provided swift justice and clear verdicts, supplemented the treasury, and extended the king's control.
What is being described?

i dont kno

Explanation:

Explanation:

1. In the United States, a state court has jurisdiction over disputes with some connection to a U.S. state, as opposed to the federal government. State courts handle the vast majority of civil and criminal cases in the United States; United States federal courts handle different types of cases.

2. (in many states of the US) a court of appeals or a court of general jurisdiction.

3.

a court of law responsible for the trial or legal supervision of children under a specified age (18 in most countries).

4.

Probate court is a segment of the judicial system that's primarily charged with handling such matters as wills, estates, conservatorships and guardianships, as well as the commitment of mentally ill persons to institutions designed to help them.

5.

a court having limited jurisdiction over minor civil and criminal matters, as matters of contract not exceeding a particular amount of money. 2. police court. Origin of magistrate's court.

b. sec, foreign relations

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is