Can you think of ways the colonists could have been successful without slaves?

Depends on how much the colonists actually know about making a settlement and also how many there are around the area. seeing as how today we do just fine without slaves it is reasonable to see that we didn't need them. but either way they would have more knowledge about the environment around them.  

Ohhh i know now they should get there fat buts up and not make people property and not make them work for them people are not products to be bought and sold slaves shouldn't have been a thing

Probably japan. they got a really high life expectancy.

The native americans, spanish, french and americans all name places in our state. the word “arkansas” came from the quapaw indians, by way of early french explorers. at the time of the early french exploration, a tribe of indians, the quapaws, lived west of the mississippi and north of the arkansas river.