How did the rulers of native american european and african empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power

There are various ways on how the rulers of native American, European, and African empires and kingdoms secure their power. Native American’s chief or local leaders usually kept their powers through their people’s respect or through violence.  European’s follow the nobility rule where mostly peasant families are hardly benefited, and African builds empires, kingdoms, mini-states that people often suffered because of the bad decisions.

Native Americans had the abundant population, a forceful bureaucratic state, productive agriculture, chiefdoms or paramount chiefdoms, paid payment and tax, and sometimes diminutive political organization that could secure and sustain their power. Whereas, European kings and princes had vast areas of land, compulsorily recruited men for military service, and occupied farmer with nobles had huge lands and handled hundreds of farmer families, meanwhile, African had lesser vassal kingdoms and depended on military for control.

EXPLANATION:

•Native American

The city size and the magnitude of its power imply that the city depended on some lesser chiefdoms under the power of a paramount leader. Social stratification was partially well-maintained through regular rivalry. War prisoners were imprisoned, and these prisoners shaped a crucial part of the North American Southeast economy.  

Slavery of Native American was not based on retaining people as property. In its place, Native Americans comprehended slaves as people who are deficient in kinship systems. Slavery was not often a perpetual condition. Regularly, an earlier slave could turn out to be a fully combined member of the community. Marriage or adoption could allow a slave to come in a kinship system and join the community. Slavery and prisoner trading turned out to be a crucial way that many Native communities regrew and maintained or gained power.

•European

European communities operated the feudal structure to establish power and labor in the Middle Ages. Europeans worked under a belief of private property rights, contrasted with shared Native American or African communities of the time. These communities were unified by the Christian Church, that functioned as the foundational establishing convention of many Europeans' daily lives.

•African

Africa was ruled by different empires with its own culture, government, religion, and so on for hundreds of years before this era. Each African kingdom was unbelievably unique, only one edge of an unparalleled diversity land—before foreign raiders occupied this land while concurrently slicing it up amid themselves and grouping it all jointly into a single location they used to know as "Africa."

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

•How did the rulers of native American, European, and African empires and kingdoms secure and sustain their power?

KEYWORDS: Native American, European, Africa, ruler

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter: Civilization

the transatlantic slave trade radically impaired africa's potential to develop economically and maintain its social and political stability. the arrival of europeans on the west african coast and their establishment of slave ports in various parts of the continent triggered a continuous process of exploitation of africa's human resources, labor, and commodities. this exploitative commerce influenced the african political and religious aristocracies, the warrior classes and the biracial elite, who made small gains from the slave trade, to participate in the oppression of their own people. the europeans, on the other hand, greatly benefited from the atlantic trade, since it allowed them to amass the raw materials that fed the industrial revolution to the detriment of african societies whose capacity to transform their modes of production into a viable entrepreneurial economy was severely halted.

john locke studied medicine and he laid a lot of groundwork for the enlightenment he also contibutied to the development of liberalism