subject
History, 26.04.2021 21:50 annamcveigh50

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
B. To understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
C. To see that event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
D. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
Why might congress have had difficulty paying the war debt after the american revolution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:10
Which diagram most accurately explains changes in media over time
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Why was the development of an alphabet an important advancement for the phonician civilization? check all that apply
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What was the name given to ronald reagan’s foreign policy
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a histori...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.11.2021 14:50
Questions on the website: 13722363