Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
A. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
B. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened
C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
D. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
SUBMIT
PREVIOUS

C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.

Explanation:

When a person uses primary sources, they are finding out about an event around the period that it happened which means that subsequent related events are not accounted for.

When using secondary sources however, people have most likely had time to review the information and make certain conclusions of the event that gives it more meaning and context. This is therefore one of the main reasons people might use secondary information as opposed to primary.

my cultural heritage consists of irish, german, native american, and others.

health care plans in the united states having high costs because they are focusing on providing quality programs for different groups of individuals. the quality of the service is based on money flow received from the members. without this investment, couldn't be possible a constant scientific searching to prevent death and illness caused because of low levels of health investigation. currently, the complaints are not about the highest cost, but about the coverage and benefits to access the necessary health services required by the members.  

besides, if a global health system is established the quality levels will fall down because of the standardized of the health. the access to care will increase but the quality will be low because it depends on the money invested.