What is the main difference between airports of the early 1920s and international airports of the 1930s? A.
Airports in the early 1920s catered to municipal and regional travel, while airports in the 1930s served as hubs for travel between countries.
B.
Airports in the early 1920s had larger runways and airport space, while airports of the 1930s had smaller, more efficient layouts.
C.
Airports in the early 1920s catered to travel between countries, while airports in the 1930s served as hubs for regional and municipal travel.
D.
Airports in the early 1920s were located in West Coast cities, while airports in the 1930s were located in East Coast cities.

Airports in the early 1920s catered to municipal and regional travel, while airports in the 1930s served as hubs for travel between countries

Explanation:

The main difference between airports of the early 1920s and international airports of the 1930s was simply due to the fact that the airports in the early 1920s serviced municipal and regional travel, while the airports in the 1930s serviced as hubs for travel between countries.

Despite the effects of the Great Depression, in the 1930s, there was a expansion of commercial aviation which was as a result of the help of partnerships. Before this period, airports were treated just exactly like harbor and dock facilities by the federal government as it was expected to be financed by the municipalities and private interests.

Therefore, the correct option is A.

a

explanation:

just took the test

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.