subject
History, 11.10.2019 16:30 xolocsin

Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for historians
a) they cant offer historians firsthand interpretation of an important event
b) they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool
c) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered
d) they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived


Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
Why was the treaty of versailles harsh on germany?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Choose all that apply. from the lesson, which of the following can lead to an empire's collapse? the forming of other empires internal problems na poor economy no one wants to lead unhappy citizens
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:40
Washington said that the united states would be "friendly and impartial" in regard to foreign conflict. what was his reason behind this statement? a jefferson and washington had determined the u.s. was too weak to wage war. b the u.s. had a treaty with both england and france, and was thus required to remain neutral. c france asked for the united states to stay out of the war, due to trade relationships. d a special envoy from england asked for strict neutrality on behalf of the united states.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What change took place in the african slave trade in the 1500's?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary source's havr over primary sources for...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360