Which statement is the best criticism of judicial activism? a) it is wrong to disagree with judicial decisions. b) it is not up to judges to personally define laws. c) judges should not be nominated by other officials. d) judges serve to bring power to political majorities.

B)It is not up to judges to personally define laws.

Explanation:

Judicial Activism is when a judge issues a ruling that overlooks legal precedents or constitutional interpretations in favor of supporting a particular political view.

The judge that is considered an activist sees the laws as malleable and believes that they are made to do the greatest social good. The problem is that each one of us has a personal view of what is a social good. Because of that, we have the Legislative Branch, to represent us and to vote for laws, this is not the judge’s work.

the committees of correspondence were the american colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the revolutionary war. in 1764, boston formed the earliest committee of correspondence to encourage opposition to britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of american paper money. the following year, new york formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the stamp act. in 1773, the virginia house of burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. the exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and bring about the formation of the first continental congress in 1774.

hi! i'd love to assist you with this however the chart is not attached to your question. could you share the attachment with me? !