Jason purchased a machine for his factory. the value of the machine was $21,500 in 2010. in 2011, the value of the machine was $18,920. in 2012, the value of the machine was $16,649.60, and in 2013, the value of the machine was $14,651.65. which statement best describes this situation? a. an increasing exponential function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant percentage of change. b. an increasing linear function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant rate of change. c. a decreasing linear function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant rate of change. d. a decreasing exponential function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant percentage of change.

D. A decreasing exponential function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant percentage of change.

Step-by-step explanation:    

We have been given that the value of the machine was $21,500 in 2010. In 2011, the value of the machine was $18,920. In 2012, the value of the machine was $16,649.60, and in 2013, the value of the machine was $14,651.65.

First of all we can see that the value of machine is decreasing as 14,651.65 is less than 21,500.  

Now let us see if the decay rate is linear or exponential.  

We can see that the rate of change between any two consecutive years is not same. Since we know that a linear function has a constant rate of change and rate of change of value of machine is not constant, therefore, our function is not a linear function.

Let us find rate of change of value of machine using percentage change formula.

We can see that the value of machine is decreasing 12% per year, therefore,  A decreasing exponential function can be used to describe this situation because it has a constant percentage of change (12%).

3/4 ÷ 3/4

step-by-step explanation:

basically divide any proper fraction with itself to fit the criteria.

so if we are using 3/4, then:

3/4 ÷ 3/4 = 1

so 1 is the quotient.

and the numerators for both these fractions is 3.   and if we divide the numerators:

3 ÷ 3 = 1

we see that quotient is equal to our original quotient as well.

a 270° rotation about point p says on e d g e n u it y (had to space it out because it says it's a misspelling so i couldn't submit it