Micaela tried to rotate the square 180° about the origin.
is her rotation correct? if not, explain why.
no, she translated the figure instead of rotating it.
o no, she reflected the figure instead of rotating it.
no, the vertices of the image and pre-image do not
correspond.
yes, the rotation is correct.

No, the vertices of the image and pre-image do not  correspond

Step-by-step explanation:

A rotation is a transformation in which a figure turns around a fixed point.

Here, the fixed point is the origin.

changes to if a square is rotated 180° about the origin.

Given: Micaela tried to rotate the square 180° about the origin.

No, his rotation is not correct as the vertices of the image and pre-image do not  correspond.

no, the equation would be invalid since they are both not equal.

step-by-step explanation:

here you got

4y-6+4y 2-9

first, you would simplify the equation on the form.

4y-6+4y 2-9

then, move all the terms that contains a y to the left and all the other terms to the right.

+4y-4y+-9-6

finally, you will simplify the left and the right side of the equation.

y=-3

i'm not entirely sure

step-by-step explanation:

if you ask home depot or lowe's they might be able to you out