What is the volume of a sphere with a diameter of 43.5 cm, rounded to the nearest tenth of a cubic centimeter?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Kayla made observations about the sellin price of a new brand of coffee that sold in the three different sized bags she recorded those observations in the following table 6 is $2.10 8 is $2.80 and 16 is to $5.60 use the relationship to predict the cost of a 20oz bag of coffee.

Opposite angles in a parrellelogram are