What makes this graph misleading? inconsistent scale on the y-axis
y-axis didn't start at zero
different bar widths
the bars should be horizontal

25.2

step-by-step explanation:

2+4x6-8/10= 25.2

168

step-by-step explanation:

i am pretty sure that the answer is 168

the correct answer is b. negative exponential growth.

step-by-step explanation:

you can tell it's an exponential function because it decreases rapidly then levels out and never touches the x-axis.

it is negative because the y-axis decreases as the x-axis increases.

therefore it is a negative exponential growth graph.

hope i !

table 3 represents a direct variation function. : )