An unanswered constitutional question about the judicial branch involves who should approve judges and justices. what “good behavior” means, with regard to judicial terms. how a supreme court is created. who should appoint judges and justices.

The correct answer is B

Correct answer choice is:

Originally “good behavior” indicates “not bad behavior” i.e. don't violate the rule. So as long as jurists do not do anything to capture them in any problem they can retain their situations for life. On a side note, I think that this resolution by the originators was a masterstroke. The evidence that judges cannot be dismissed, notes all understanding of political revenge out of the equation, suggesting the judge in question is easy to execute his judgments or statements without the emerging panic of failing his job. The judiciary can simply do what he believes is genuine.

c: in the east might be the correct answer