Describe more than one side of a difficult situation you may have faced?

One answer to this question is, when you have a way of acting in front of a difficult issue, but those you love and trust more force you to see other ways that totally contradict your own position.

Explanation:

When faced with difficult situation, there is always different ways of approaching the matter and solving it. So, for example, when you have to make a choice on whether to go to a certain event that you want to go, but you hear those you love most, and trust most, telling you different things. Some say, yes, go ahead, do it, and others will tell you not to, because it is dangerous. You end up looking at every single face that a situation may have, and you are the one left with the final decision of how you wish to proceed.

For example, the death of a loved one on a traffic accident. You are trapped between blaming that death on the decisions made by the person, your own position, your ideas on how you would have approached the matter, and finally, what others think about the matter. In the end, you must face all the facets and choose what to do, and what to believe.

answer:

d. because dr. laguardia selected a widely used measure, his study generalizes to has strong external validity. external validity has limited external validity. other applications of this measure.

the widely used measure that he applied to his experiment was the benton facial recognition test. it employed on to football players and as result, only players who suffered brain concussions did not pas this test. and although it has an external validity, it is limited because it isn't general to apply to other population.

the supreme court plays a big role in government. the constitution gives them ability to check the president and the congresses actions and dictate if their actions are allowed by the constitution or not.

hope this .