The law of effect was most clearly highlighted by

a. pavlov's studies of conditioned salivation.
b. garcia and koelling's research on taste aversion.
c. skinner's experiments on reinforcement.
d. watson and rayner's findings on fear conditioning.

The law of effect was most clearly highlighted by

C. Skinner's experiments on reinforcement.

Explanation:

The Law of Effect finds that when one is exposed to a satisfying event it becomes more likely to never repeated; when receives an unsatisfying event, the action becomes less likely to be repeated.

B.F. Skinner’s work on operant conditioning and reinforcement most clearly highlight this law.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

dont understand question can you makeit more better