Kai erikson went to buffalo creek, west virginia in 1972 following a highly destructive flood. based on his interviews with residents and after spending considerable time in buffalo creek, erikson analyzed his qualitative data and theorized that the damage to the social ties in the community caused by natural disasters were just as destructive as the physical damage to the affected community. erikson's study is a good example of what kind of research?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

How might we create a sense of civility in both our social circles and our government?

Katie and her father are looking at the pipes around their house. they find that some of the pipes have rust on them, making them look and feel different than normal pipes. what kind of change have the rusted pipes gone through? a. a physical change b. a vibration change c. a chemical change d. a temperature change