Why does Plato argue that Aristocracy is a superior form of government to Democracy? Do you agree with Plato’s criticisms of democracy? Explain your reasoning fully, and use examples to support what you say.

Plato believed that the aristocracy would allow only people with the right intellect to rule the country efficiently. He believed that aristocracy was the combination of wisdom and virtue and that this is reserved for only a limited number of noble citizens who have full access to the highest quality education.

Explanation:

The aristocracy is a way of establishing a national government through specific people in society who would have all the power of governance in a country. These people would be chosen through noble lineage and wealth.

Aristoteles and Plato were great supporters of these systems, as they believed that only people with full access to quality education would have sufficient ethical and moral intellect to be a head of government. Only nobles had this access.

These philosophers believed that the aristocracy was much better than democracy, because democracy gave freedom to anyone to stand for political office, in addition to allowing people who had no access to education and therefore a "low intellect" to choose those who would represent the government.

Although today, some people believe that the aristocracy is a good form of government, we know that it is not right to believe that. This is because keeping a country's governance power in the hands of a single family, where the post of head of state is chosen through a lineage is very dangerous.

Democracy allows us to remove tyrannical and inefficient leaders from power and choose that candidate who represents ideas that will benefit the country and lead its people to advance.

answer; elasticity of the lungs decreases;