How do you Rosa Parks became a hero in a inspiration to people all over the nation who were looking for a recent quality

In December 1955, 42-year-old seamstress Rosa Parks joined the workers at the bus stop after a long,

hard day at the tailoring shop. It seemed to take the bus forever to get there, but it eventually it did come,

and that’s when some real trouble began.

When she boarded the bus the seats available were quickly taken. Parks decided to sit in the “white”

section of the bus. The bus driver told Rosa and several other African-Americans to give up their seats to

some lighter-skinned people who got on the bus. The other African-Americans moved, but Rosa refused to

move. The bus driver called the police. Rosa Parks was arrested right then and there. Later she and her

husband lost both of their jobs.

Her refusal to move on the bus sparked a movement against segregation in Montgomery Alabama which

started with the 381-day bus boycott by African-Americans.

Later she and her husband moved to Detroit Michigan where she died of natural causes at the age of

92 on October 24, 2005. For more than 23 years she was a staff assistant to representative John Conyers

of Michigan. In 1994 Rosa, then 81 years old was attacked by a burglar. With help from the community the

burglar was caught and convicted and he apologized.

Rosa Parks wrote her autobiography Rosa Parks: My Story, then authored Quiet Strength, an

autobiography with George Reed.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )