subject
Social Studies, 28.10.2020 23:20 bekahmc1p6k6vj

Why does the article imply that the French were happy when the colonists won their freedom from Great Britain? 1.France and Great Britain were rivals and France was happy to see someone defeat Great Britain 2.The French hated the colonists and were happy when Great Britain beat them at war 3. The French knew they would be paid after the colonists beat the English 4. France wanted the colonists to win so they could get their land backsocial?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:10
The two-factor theory of emotion was proposed by
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40
To create the proper tone for an argumentative essay, writers should delete personal “i” statements. include vague statements. remove any slang words. focus on the evidence.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:00
What are the roles of the fcc in the us? check all that apply. regulating the country’s communications infrastructure ensuring communication technology is compatible with existing technol
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why does the article imply that the French were happy when the colonists won their freedom from Grea...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363