In 1776, the Second Continental Congress issued the Declaration of Independence, stating their specific grievances with the British monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. After the colonies separated from the British monarchy and formed the United States of America, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) If not a monarchy, what type of government was the United States going to have? 2) What kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?

IntroductionIn 1776, the Second Continental Congress issuedtheDeclaration of Independence, stating their specificgrievances with the British monarchy and why they weregoing to create a separate government. After the coloniesseparated from the British monarchy and formed the UnitedStates of America, they had to answer some crucialquestions: 1) If not a monarchy, what type of governmentwas the United States going to have? 2) What kind ofgovernment was going to protect the people without violatingtheir individual liberties?The Framersdecided to create a limited government based on ideas ofnatural rights, popular sovereignty, republicanism, and thesocial contract. We can see some of these ideas pop up in the

foundational documents of the United States, including theDeclaration of Independence and the Constitution. But whatare these democratic ideas and why has the United Statescontinued to hold onto them for more than 250 years?This article describes each of these democratic ideas andexplains why the Framers used them as a basis forgovernment.What is a limited government?After the colonies decided to separate from the Britishmonarchy, the Framers had to develop a system ofgovernment that would gain the support of all of the Patriots.They agreed on a system of limited government.

Explanation:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

answer; utilitarian;