Carr shows careful consideration of other positions by presenting several of them in his essay. Which of the following statements best summarizes, in general, the counterarguments that Carr presents? a. Modern people no longer need to read for fun because they have DVDs and television for entertainment.
b. Other technologies that at first seemed detrimental have ended up being beneficial.
c. The way we search the internet affects only our behavior, not the way we think.
d. The internet is not going away, so we may as well embrace it.

Match the following items. 1. free enterprise system 2. mixed economy 3. the former soviet union 4. land and capital (a) private and state ownership of business (b) factors of production (c) private ownership of capital (d) command economy

Which of the following statements about the effects of subliminal stimuli is most accurate? subliminal stimuli have no effect on attitudes or behavior. subliminal stimuli can lead people to vote for political candidates they do not support. subliminal exposure to thirst-related words can lead thirsty people to drink more. subliminal stimuli can lead people to violate deeply held values.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.