5. Are the pronouns and antecedents used in the poem congruent to each other? a. yes, the antecedent is ‘Snow’ and it's pronoun is ‘it’

b. yes, the antecedent is ‘it’ and it's pronoun is ‘Snow’

c. no, the antecedent is ‘Snow’ and it uses the pronoun ‘it’ and ‘we’ wherein snow is a non-human entity and it is neutral so it should use the pronoun "we".

d. no, the author didn't used any of it in his poem.

use this site

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."

chavez's example shows that nonviolent protest can work well. it shows that one nonviolent man can stop a mob, which proves chavez's point and persuades people to protest nonviolently.