Why is energy an essential part of human life

What is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.what is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

How are decisions by the supreme court under chief justice john marshall strengthened federal power