Look at the bolded pronouns. choose all of the statements that have correct pronoun-antecedent agreement are the shoes in the corner yours or mine? it is mine. these books look interesting. have you read them? rain has been falling all day long. i hope it stops soon. the clouds look threatening today. are he rain clouds? the clouds look threatening today. are he rain clouds? one girl has red shoes. i want to be just like her. robbie is a new student here. have you met he yet? my dog won the gold medal. i was so proud of them! hillary and i went to the mall last night. did you see us there?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.