The older jim becomes, the more difficult it is going to be for him to

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

What if the united states, mexico, and canada took the eu’s example and joined to forms north american union ? based on your knowledge of the europe union, describe two setbacks or hurdles that this idea might face

1.3.3 quiz: primary and secondary sourcesquestion 4 of 102 pointsa secondary source is reliable and credible if the person who created thesource is an expert on the topic, is educated and respected in the field ofstudy, and: