Awrit of habeas corpus prevents a person from being locked up without appearing before a? a. sheriff b. judge c. jury d. police officer

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: breach of confidentiality, loss of autonomy, and study proceduresstudy procedures, breach of confidentiality, and loss of employmentinvasion of privacy, adverse reaction to study drug, and discriminationinvasion of privacy, breach of confidentiality, and study procedures

What is the difference between one’s motive and one’s intent to commit a crime, and which is the most important in our legal system?