1. What is the main idea of the article? (This is a summary of the main point(s) of the article in 1-3 sentences MAX.) 2. What is the KEY type of conflict shown in this article? (Write 1-3 sentences identifying the type of person vs. conflict and how you see it in the article.)
3. What is the main takeaway, lesson, or message of the article? (1 sentence) The main lesson/message/takeaway of the article is that...
4. What is one word-for-word QUOTE from the article that you think BEST demonstrates that lesson/message/takeaway? (1-3 sentences)

idk

explanation:

beginner

government is strong when they have the ability to persuade those they govern to believe government has enough power to force them or should be forcing them to do government’s will.

when enough of the citizenry do not believe government can force them or should force them to do its bidding, government has lost or will lose its strength and power to coerce.

when enough of the citizenry do believe government can force or should force them to do its bidding, they become passive at the least or actively pro-government and repeat government’s own rhetoric to pass on what they have been persuaded by government’s propaganda.

a true majority isn’t always needed to govern or to stop government. many times all that is needed is a strong minority. if a determined 30% of the population rises up against government in a concerted effort to bring it down, this size minority usually will succeed as long as those actively opposing the minority are less in force than the minority. so if 41% of the population sits at home watching tv rooting for one side or the other, they don’t matter. it’s the active parties who make a difference.

the third answer is right : )

i hope this you with your work! : )

bruh nobody wants to do that lol good luck tho