What was the main disagreement between abolitionists who were “immediatists” compared to those who were “gradualists”?
a. “should we use moral or constitutional arguments? ”
b. “should women be allowed in abolitionist groups? ”
c. “should slavery end slowly or quickly? ”
d. “should slavery be abolished violently or peacefully? ”

(C). “Should slavery end slowly or quickly?”

Explanation:

During the Abolitionists movement in the United States, there were several groups that emerge – differing in how they prefer the slavery abolishment to be phased. These groups were the Gradualists and the Immediatists. The first group advocates for a more cautious view of slavery abolishment – they preferred to stop states from taking on new slaves, and supporting the idea of compensated emancipation – basically, paying slave owners to let go of the slaves. The other group, Immediatists, wanted slavery to be stopped entirely as quickly as possible; alongside other reforms of African American rights.

i think the fact that abraham lincoln was a tyrant

or probably like what the other person said from sitting in the chair to get assasinated xd

~batmans wife dun dun